20 T.C. 587 (1953)

r
r

Legal expenses incurred primarily to defend or perfect title to property are considered capital expenditures and are not deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses, even if the lawsuit also involves claims for income (like dividends or interest).

r
r

Summary

r

Midco Oil Corporation sought to deduct legal fees incurred while defending a lawsuit brought by a bankruptcy trustee. The trustee’s suit challenged Midco’s title to its own stock and sought recovery of the stock’s value, along with past dividends and interest. The Tax Court ruled that because the primary purpose of the lawsuit was to challenge Midco’s title to the stock, the legal fees were capital expenditures and not deductible as ordinary business expenses. This ruling emphasizes the importance of determining the “primary purpose” of litigation when assessing the deductibility of legal fees.

r
r

Facts

r

In 1937, Midco Oil purchased 2,000 shares of its own stock. Subsequently, the trustee in bankruptcy for Hoagland & Allum Co., Inc., (the entity from which Midco acquired the shares) filed a supplemental complaint alleging that Hoagland & Allum had fraudulently sold the stock to Midco. The trustee claimed Midco had no valid title to the shares and sought the stock’s value, plus all dividends paid on the stock since 1937, plus interest. The total claim was $144,277.78.

r
r

Procedural History

r

Midco defended the trustee’s suit in United States District Court. The District Court ruled in favor of Midco, finding that Midco was a bona fide purchaser for value and without notice, and that Midco received good title to the stock. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that judgment, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari. Midco then sought to deduct the legal fees incurred in defending the suit as ordinary and necessary business expenses on its 1943 and 1944 tax returns. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed the deductions, arguing the expenses were capital in nature. Midco then petitioned the Tax Court.

r
r

Issue(s)

r

Whether attorney’s fees and related expenditures paid to defend against an action attacking the petitioner’s title to stock and claiming dividends and interest while stock was held by petitioner are deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses, or whether they are capital expenditures.

r
r

Holding

r

No, because the major objective and primary purpose of the action was to dispute the petitioner’s title to the 2,000 shares of its stock purchased on September 3, 1937, and the other phases of the litigation were only corollary.

r
r

Court’s Reasoning

r

The Tax Court relied heavily on Safety Tube Corporation v. Commissioner, 8 T.C. 757 (1947), which held that expenses incurred in defending title are capital expenditures. The court emphasized that the